Manhood, Masculinity and Honor in the News 11/21/10

Shad Smith

I had never heard of Shad Smith, felony fighter and also a homo. He’d probably be an interesting guy to have a few beers with. Here’s Shad’s Sherdog profile. Looks like he’s still fighting. Go get ‘em, man.

Along the same lines…

Emile Griffith

Beat a man to death in the ring after his opponent called him a fag. Now that’s what I call a hate crime. This documentary might be worth a watch.

How do you make a hormone?

Don’t pay her.

I think my dad told me that joke. But seriously, several guys sent me links to some version of this story about hormone-disrupting chemicals in domestic products which is currently making the rounds. I always find it interesting when crunchy environmentalist liberal types, who are usually also feminist friendly, think this is a bad thing, but good on ‘em. The last thing we need in the civilized world is more effeminate males.

Softeners in plastics may affect masculinity in young boys, study says

Feminists are already trying to spin this with the typical “what does masculinity really mean?” propaganda.

“If you are a man in life and you haven’t gone to a gay bar, you haven’t really danced.

John Mayer (whoever he is…I’m out of that loop and I really don’t want to know…I think he’s famously dating someone famous) is apparently an omega extraordinaire.

Chris Illuminati tests the rules of manhood.

And decides they are good rules. Entertaining.

What is this Asylum magazine? Chris should interview me. I can talk about manhood for hours. Yeah, that’s a hint. He should also check out The Spearhead.

2 Responses to “Manhood, Masculinity and Honor in the News 11/21/10”

1. A. Jaime Mendenhall says:

   December 17, 2009 at 4:31 pm

   Does the fact that Shad’s boyfriend (should I use that word, or do you have another term?) is a makeup artist fuck with your world?
2. Jack Donovan says:

   December 17, 2009 at 6:14 pm

   If you want to say something, say it.

   Your comment reads as passive-aggression, so unless I’m reading it incorrectly or you want to re-phrase it, it is unworthy of a substantive response.